The trial of George for the murder of Lenny was very difficult. It was clear to me there was no plaisanterie or premeditation in this tough case. Nevertheless , justice had to be served pertaining to the loss of your life. I was the third prosecuting lawyer in this case and felt the sentencing was fair and just.
During the trial there were several witnesses who also testified for the defense and prosecution. Nevertheless , few were of actual help and did not offer strong testimony. If anything, I think the defense witnesses helped the prosecution more because a lot of them cared for Lenny and assumed that George should be identified guilty for what he had performed. The protection couldn't provide strong data that turned out George was protecting Lenny from the upset mod that wanted to eliminate him. This allowed for the prosecution to simply find George guilty of non-reflex manslaughter.
When we had time to get across examine the witnesses and George, it had been time for the jury to produce a decision upon whether George should be located innocent or guilty. His fate was now inside their hands. Deliberation was quick, which usually is definitely not a good thing for the defense. I had been a little bothered the jurors would feel sorry for George because Lenny was his best friend, yet that had not been the case. The jury located George guilty of voluntary drug trafficking and sentenced him to 12 years in prison. From your very beginning We felt this could be an easy circumstance to earn, especially if the prosecution went for Drug trafficking vs . homicide in the 1st or subsequent degree.
Representing the criminal prosecution was a satisfying role and I was thrilled with the results. I really enjoyed playing the role because I got to cross analyze the witnesses and George, and make the closing argument for the side.
In conclusion, I do believe the trial was fast and good. Although the account is tragic the sentencing was suitable for the criminal offense committed.